hantacount
Live-Tracker
Live16Gesamtfälle3Todesfälle14Länder19%Fallsterblichkeit
Krankheitsvergleich

Hantavirus im Vergleich zu COVID, SARS, MERS, Ebola, Lassa und Marburg

Wie schneidet das Andes-Hantavirus im Vergleich zu den anderen Emerging-Viren ab, nach denen am häufigsten gefragt wird? Alle Zahlen stammen direkt aus WHO- und CDC-Faktenblättern.

Zuletzt geprüft: 9. Mai 2026 · Quellen: WHO- und US-CDC-Themenseiten.

Vergleich sieben viraler Krankheiten nach Fallsterblichkeitsrate, R0, Inkubation, Übertragung, Behandlung und Reservoirwirt.
KriteriumANDV1995SARS2003MERS2012EVD1976Lassa1969COVID2019MVD1967
Fallsterblichkeitsrate30–40%~10% (≈50% in adults >65)~35%~50% (range 25–90%)~1% overall; ~15% hospitalised~0.5–1% IFR (ancestral, pre-vaccine)~50% (range 24–88%)
R0 (Basisreproduktionszahl)<1 (rare P2P clusters)2–4<1 in community; clusters in hospitals1.5–2.5<1 community; healthcare-associated clusters2–3 (ancestral); higher for later variants1–2
Inkubationszeit2–4 weeks (up to 6)2–10 days2–14 days (median 5)2–21 days6–21 days2–14 days (median 5)2–21 days
ÜbertragungswegInhaled rodent excreta; rare person-to-person (ANDV only)Respiratory droplets, fomites, healthcare-associatedCamel-to-human; limited human-to-human in healthcareDirect contact with body fluids; safe-burial practices criticalInhalation/ingestion of rodent excreta; nosocomial human-to-humanRespiratory aerosols and droplets; pre-symptomatic spreadDirect contact with body fluids; bat exposure (caves)
Mensch-zu-Mensch-ÜbertragungBegrenztJaBegrenztJaBegrenztJaJa
Verfügbare BehandlungSupportive care, oxygen, ECMO; ribavirin investigationalSupportive care; no specific antiviralSupportive care; no specific antiviral approvedTwo monoclonal antibody therapies licensed (Inmazeb, Ebanga); supportive careRibavirin (early administration); supportive careAntivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir); supportive careSupportive care; investigational antibodies and antivirals
Verfügbarer ImpfstoffNone licensedNone licensed (development halted after eradication)None licensed (candidates in trials)Ervebo (rVSV-ZEBOV, licensed 2019); Zabdeno/Mvabea regimenNone licensed (CEPI-funded candidates in trials)Multiple licensed mRNA, viral-vector and protein subunit vaccinesNone licensed (Sabin/cAd3-Marburg in trials)
Geografische VerbreitungArgentina, Chile, with imported clusters worldwide (2026)29 countries during 2002–2003; eradicated in humans since 2004Arabian Peninsula; sporadic exports to 27 countriesSub-Saharan Africa; sporadic exportsWest Africa (Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea)Global pandemic since 2020; now endemic seasonal circulationSub-Saharan Africa; rare exports
Erstmals identifiziert1995200320121976196920191967
VirusfamilieHantaviridae (Bunyavirales)CoronaviridaeCoronaviridaeFiloviridaeArenaviridaeCoronaviridaeFiloviridae
ReservoirwirtLong-tailed pygmy rice rat (Oligoryzomys longicaudatus)Horseshoe bats; civets as intermediate hostDromedary camels (bats as ancestral host)Fruit bats (suspected); primates amplifying hostMultimammate rat (Mastomys natalensis)Bats (likely ancestral); intermediate host debatedEgyptian rousette fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus)

Head-to-head deep dives

Want a focused, two-disease comparison? Each page goes deeper than the row table above — full metric grid, detail cards, schema.org MedicalCondition markup.

Krankheitsprofile

Klicken Sie auf eine Krankheit, um ihr Profil zu öffnen. Jede Karte verlinkt zur primären WHO- oder CDC-Quelle — und falls verfügbar, zu einem ausführlicheren HantaCount-Artikel.

Hantavirus (Andes virus, ANDV)

ANDV

Andes virus is the only hantavirus with documented person-to-person transmission. The 2026 MV Hondius cluster is being closely watched because its cruise-ship setting matches the close-contact conditions where ANDV chains have appeared historically.

Erstmals identifiziert
1995
Virusfamilie
Hantaviridae (Bunyavirales)
Reservoirwirt
Long-tailed pygmy rice rat (Oligoryzomys longicaudatus)

SARS (SARS-CoV-1)

SARS

SARS spread efficiently through close respiratory contact, particularly in hospitals. Aggressive case isolation and contact tracing, not pharmaceuticals, ended the outbreak — and there has been no human SARS-CoV-1 case since 2004.

Erstmals identifiziert
2003
Virusfamilie
Coronaviridae
Reservoirwirt
Horseshoe bats; civets as intermediate host

MERS (MERS-CoV)

MERS

MERS-CoV has high lethality but does not transmit efficiently between humans outside healthcare settings. Most cases trace back to direct or indirect contact with infected dromedary camels.

Erstmals identifiziert
2012
Virusfamilie
Coronaviridae
Reservoirwirt
Dromedary camels (bats as ancestral host)

Ebola virus disease (Zaire)

EVD

Ebola is highly lethal but requires direct contact with body fluids to transmit. The licensure of Ervebo in 2019 and effective monoclonal antibodies have transformed outbreak response.

Erstmals identifiziert
1976
Virusfamilie
Filoviridae
Reservoirwirt
Fruit bats (suspected); primates amplifying host

Lassa fever

Lassa

About 80% of Lassa infections are mild or asymptomatic, masking transmission in endemic regions. Person-to-person spread is mostly limited to healthcare settings and household contact with body fluids.

Erstmals identifiziert
1969
Virusfamilie
Arenaviridae
Reservoirwirt
Multimammate rat (Mastomys natalensis)

COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)

COVID

SARS-CoV-2 spreads efficiently before symptoms begin, which is exactly the property that drove the 2020 pandemic. Hantaviruses lack this trait, which is the single biggest reason ANDV is not expected to behave like COVID.

Erstmals identifiziert
2019
Virusfamilie
Coronaviridae
Reservoirwirt
Bats (likely ancestral); intermediate host debated

Marburg virus disease

MVD

Marburg shares transmission and clinical features with Ebola but no licensed vaccine yet exists. Outbreaks have been small and contained through case isolation and safe burial practices.

Erstmals identifiziert
1967
Virusfamilie
Filoviridae
Reservoirwirt
Egyptian rousette fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus)
Tracker-Vergleich

Hantavirus-Tracker-Vergleich — 2026

Sechs Tracker wurden innerhalb von Tagen nach der WHO-DON-599-Veröffentlichung gestartet. Hier ist ein ehrlicher, funktionsweiser Vergleich, damit Sie den für Ihre Bedürfnisse geeigneten auswählen können — auch wenn das nicht wir sind.

FunktionHantaCountHantavirusMapHantaCounterHantavirus.liveLive MapTracker.io
Languages supported10 (en, tr, ar, es, nl, fr, de, ja, fi, ru)1 (en)1 (en)1 (en)2 (en, es)1 (en)
Open dataset (CC-BY)
JSON + CSV
Source-attributed counts
every count linked
footer only
Long-form explainers
5 articles, medically reviewed
FAQ only
Medical reviewer disclosed
Methodology page
Ads / paywall / affiliates
none
no ads
ads present
Map view
Auto-updating from primary sources
WHO/ECDC RSS + manual approval
30 min cadence
OpenGraph live counter image
RTL/Arabic layout

Where HantaCount wins

  • • Five languages including Arabic with full RTL layout
  • • Open dataset (CC-BY-4.0) as JSON + CSV
  • • Five long-form explainers, all medically reviewed
  • • Every count is linked to its primary source document
  • • Auto-updating OG image — embed-friendly for journalists
  • • No ads, no paywall, no affiliates — ever

Where others may suit you better

  • Hantavirus.live shows the live AIS ship position — useful if you only care about MV Hondius' whereabouts.
  • HantavirusMap has broader historical context across all hantavirus species, not just the 2026 outbreak.
  • HantaCounter refreshes every 30 minutes — slightly more frequent than our hourly cycle.

How we built this comparison

We visited each site on May 8, 2026 and recorded the visible features. We did not test paid tiers (none of these sites have one) and we did not include private dashboards. If anything is wrong — especially something that disadvantages a competitor — email hello@hantacount.com and we'll fix it. Honest comparison or none.

Try the live tracker